For the last couple of years, here in North East Wales, local communities, local authorities, politicians, and town & community councils have all been facing a political charm offensive from the carbon capture industry.

Having successfully captured the imagination of Westminster politicians with their tales of a ‘low carbon future’, the industry has now set its sights on capturing carbon dioxide in the North West of England before pumping and dumping that ‘captured’ carbon into empty gas wells off the North Wales coast.

These ‘blue hydrogen’ plans are being put forward under the ‘Hynet’ brand, which is an umbrella group funded by fossil fuel polluters such as ENI, Essar and Ineos. Wales, of course, has history with Ineos, after previously agreeing to allow the company to build gas-guzzling 4-wheel drive vehicles at a plant vacated by Ford in Bridgend. Ineos would later pull out of the deal in favour of a site in France, leaving the Welsh taxpayer with a £4m bill.

One of the world’s largest petrochemical companies, Ineos is well-known for tax avoidance and union busting practices, and is owned by Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who has lobbied to weaken green taxes and reduce restrictions on fracking.

Red flags, anyone?

Whilst Wales has been here before with Ineos, the people of the North Wales region have every right to be especially sceptical about the flashy brochures of massive, climate-wrecking conglomerates promising a future of clean energy aplenty. On Anglesey, people spent more than a decade being promised the fruits of nuclear development at Wylfa. The plans faced strong local opposition, with campaigners pointing out that the project was always doomed to failure. They were right; in 2019, Hitachi announced the ‘suspension’ of the Wylfa nuclear project, before pulling out entirely a year later.

These examples expose a broader problem with the extractive nature of much of the Welsh economy. Whether it is foreign fossil fuel polluters or the Crown Estate, non-Welsh entities are exploiting Welsh natural resources and syphoning the profits outside of the country. Support, and subsidies, for these activities are justified on the basis of providing jobs, but is that alone enough?

When I have asked Hynet about whether the workers on their project will be guaranteed union recognition or about whether they have any plans to reinvest a percentage of their profits into North Wales, I have received only obfuscation and evasion in response.

Fundamentally, this project, subsidised to the tune of tens of millions by the UK taxpayer, will serve to entrench fossil fuel reliance whilst posing a significant safety risk to residents in North Wales living above, and near, the pipeline.

The UK Health and Safety Executive when referring to Hynet said, ‘HSE accepts the current evidence base which indicates that CO₂, as it will be processed, transported and stored as part of Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) operations, presents major hazard potential’. The odourless, colourless liquid is both an asphyxiant and intoxicant.

In 2021, the head of the UK Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association, Chris Jackson, resigned stating: “I believe passionately that I would be betraying future generations by remaining silent on the fact that blue hydrogen is at best an expensive distraction, and at worst a lock-in for continued fossil fuel use that guarantees we will fail to meet our decarbonisation goals.”

To date, barely a single carbon capture scheme worldwide has collected as much carbon as promised. For example, the United States oil and gas giant Chevron has acknowledged that its flagship carbon capture and storage project off Australia’s north-west coast is operating at just a third of its capacity, with the facility beleaguered by problems.

The US itself has spent billions of dollars of public and private money on decades worth of carbon capture projects, only to be repaid with colossal failure. One of the largest was the Petra Nova coal plant in Texas, once the poster child for carbon dioxide removal, now shuttered for good.

In setting aside £20bn of taxpayers’ money for the carbon capture gamble, the UK Government is planning on repeating the mistakes of the United States. Perhaps the most egregious part of all of this sordid affair is the impact that £20bn could have if spent on cost-effective and proven green renewable energy projects, including a mass-home insulation programme.

It is vital, and clearly in the public interest, for there to be transparency regarding the future liabilities of this project, and who is likely to pay the price for those liabilities. As those who opposed Wylfa know, the Japanese say that building a nuclear power plant is like ‘building a house without a toilet’ in order to underline the problematic nature of dealing with nuclear waste, which needs to be secured for thousands of years. Perhaps Hynet have learnt from the example of Wylfa in that they do at least have a plan, of sorts, for dealing with the waste carbon – storing it permanently under the sea.

But this poses a whole host of its own problems, including the risk of leakage. Already, the increased amount of carbon dioxide in our oceans is having a major debilitating impact on animal life due to the acidification of the water, as well as the global rise in sea temperatures.

From turning carbon dioxide into pellets to restore soils and increase crop yields, through to using carbon dioxide in precision fermentation to create food, progressive technological solutions are consistently being developed which threaten to make a large and expensive project such as Hynet obsolete.

Researchers for the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis have stated that trapped carbon dioxide will need to be monitored for centuries to ensure it does not leak into the wider atmosphere. But despite this, ENI have said they will only monitor their carbon dioxide reservoirs off the North Wales coast for 20 years. Perhaps they haven’t learnt the lessons of Wylfa after all?

Just last year, 80,000 litres of oil spilt into the sea off the North Wales coast – who was responsible? You guessed it, ENI. Why should this fossil fuel polluting company be given further opportunity to cause environmental destruction across North Wales? Why instead is the UK Government not investing in proven, safe and reliable renewable technologies which will create the green energy we need and deliver jobs for local communities?

I believe that Hynet’s plans fail to comply with either the ethos or the objectives of the Wellbeing of Future Generations Act, especially when partnering with a multi-national such as ENI, who are facing a ‘lobbying and greenwashing’ lawsuit in Italy. But more than that, their plans tell a depressing story of the exploitation of Welsh natural resources for private profit.

As such, in Wales, we have a duty to oppose this act of political, climate, and economic folly.

•  This article was originally written for and published by Nation.Cymru: https://nation.cymru/opinion/carbon-capture-in-north-wales-an-expensive-white-elephant/